Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 12;22:578. doi: 10.1186/s12870-022-03978-y

Table 1.

Effect of SL on the photosynthetic parameters of P. purpureum leaves under drought stress

Treatment Net photosynthetic rate Stomatal conductance Transpiration rate Intercellular CO2 concentration Water use efficiency
μmol·(m2·s)−1 μmol·(m2·s)− 1 mmol·(m2·s)− 1 μmol∙mol− 1 mmol·mol− 1
24 h N 19.94 ± 0.24a 174.20 ± 1.80a 4.46 ± 0.02a 154.00 ± 2.28b 4.47 ± 0.03a
D 12.14 ± 0.51c 98.00 ± 2.55b 3.23 ± 0.07c 148.80 ± 8.48b 3.76 ± 0.16b
T1 16.54 ± 0.90b 178.60 ± 8.27a 3.81 ± 0.11b 189.60 ± 10.12a 4.35 ± 0.21a
T2 17.06 ± 1.73ab 184.20 ± 23.50a 4.43 ± 0.34a 184.60 ± 3.94a 3.81 ± 0.11b
T3 15.94 ± 1.01b 172.80 ± 11.68a 4.54 ± 0.15a 189.60 ± 2.73a 3.50 ± 0.15bc
T4 12.42 ± 1.08c 123.80 ± 10.88b 4.00 ± 0.17ab 183.20 ± 5.68a 3.08 ± 0.15c
48 h N 18.80 ± 0.33a 137.40 ± 4.20b 4.21 ± 0.06a 133.20 ± 6.35c 4.47 ± 0.14a
D 11.14 ± 0.56bc 103.40 ± 6.71c 2.66 ± 0.09cd 185.20 ± 15.86b 4.21 ± 0.25ab
T1 12.48 ± 1.00b 165.60 ± 16.34a 3.91 ± 0.20ab 225.80 ± 8.65a 3.19 ± 0.19c
T2 12.84 ± 0.82b 133.60 ± 9.50b 3.56 ± 0.17b 194.00 ± 7.12b 3.61 ± 0.18bc
T3 11.94 ± 0.30b 112.00 ± 4.44bc 2.85 ± 0.07c 181.40 ± 5.07b 4.19 ± 0.11ab
T4 9.38 ± 0.97c 94.00 ± 6.56c 2.38 ± 0.12d 201.20 ± 10.20ab 3.90 ± 0.26ab
120 h N 19.56 ± 0.54a 168.60 ± 16.50a 5.04 ± 0.31a 138.60 ± 7.26b 4.24 ± 0.20bc
D 7.66 ± 1.15d 59.20 ± 8.11d 1.78 ± 0.19c 163.60 ± 8.43a 3.91 ± 0.16c
T1 14.98 ± 0.50b 128.20 ± 5.28b 3.16 ± 0.15b 159.20 ± 1.53a 4.76 ± 0.14ab
T2 13.16 ± 0.75b 99.00 ± 8.45c 2.76 ± 0.10b 137.40 ± 6.55b 4.75 ± 0.16ab
T3 10.42 ± 0.93c 76.00 ± 8.23cd 2.11 ± 0.18c 138.60 ± 11.05b 4.96 ± 0.25a
T4 7.50 ± 1.02d 53.00 ± 5.84d 1.65 ± 0.15c 148.20 ± 11.36ab 4.46 ± 0.26abc

Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate significant differences (P < 0.05). N: normal watering treatment; D: drought stress treatment only; T1, T2, T3, and T4 represent the different treatment concentrations of SL under drought stress (1, 3, 5, and 7 μmol·L− 1, respectively)