Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 31;11:92. doi: 10.4103/abr.abr_182_21

Table 3.

Studies were evaluating bone mineral density after bariatric surgery

Time of Study Author Year Surgery Follow up (months) BMD loss (%)

F.N. T.H. L.S.
Short term follow up Chen et al.[158] 2020 LSG 12 6* 10.5 0.9
Gerber P et al.[159] 2021 LSG/RYGB 12 LSG <RYGB - LSG <RYGB
Luger et al.[160] 2018 OAGB 12 - 13 7
Ieong et al.[161] 2021 RYGB 24 9 8 3
LSG 7 10 1
LSG/RYGB NS NS NS
Long term follow up Brzozowska et al.[162] 2021 LSG 36 - 9 0.1
RYGB - 14 7.2
LSG/RYGB - LSG <RYGB LSG <RYGB
Cadart et al.[32] 2020 LSG 48 8.1±5.5 7.4±6.4 2.0±7.2
RYGB 8.6±5 10.9±6.3 2.8±5.8
LSG/RYGB NS LSG <RYGB NS
Lindeman et al.[163] 2020 RYGB 60 14.1±8.0 15.3±6.3 7.8±7.6

*Highlight; significant. NS: Nonsignificant, BMD: Bone mineral density, F.N.: Femoral neck, T.H.: Total hip, L.S.: Lumbar spine, RYGB: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, LAGB: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric band, LSG: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy