Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 1;10:e14460. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14460

Table 3. Quality assessment of individual studies.

Reference Random allocation Concealed allocation Baseline similarity Subjects blinding Therapist blinding Assessor blinding <15% dropouts Intention to treat Between-group differences Point measures and measures of variability Total Score Quality rating
Waterhouse et al. (2007) 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 5/10 Fair
Hammouda et al. (2018) 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 5/10 Fair
Daaloul, Souissi & Davenne (2019) 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 5/10 Fair
Brotherton et al. (2019) 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 6/10 Good
Romdhani et al. (2020) 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 5/10 Fair
Ajjimaporn, Ramyarangsi & Siripornpanich (2020) 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 6/10 Good
Petit et al. (2014) 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 4/10 Fair
Blanchfield et al. (2018) 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 5/10 Fair
Boukhris et al. (2019) 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 6/10 Good
Abdessalem et al. (2019) 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 6/10 Good
Hsouna et al. (2019) 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 6/10 Good
Boukhris et al. (2020) 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 6/10 Good