Table 3. Quality assessment of individual studies.
Reference | Random allocation | Concealed allocation | Baseline similarity | Subjects blinding | Therapist blinding | Assessor blinding | <15% dropouts | Intention to treat | Between-group differences | Point measures and measures of variability | Total Score | Quality rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Waterhouse et al. (2007) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5/10 | Fair |
Hammouda et al. (2018) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5/10 | Fair |
Daaloul, Souissi & Davenne (2019) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5/10 | Fair |
Brotherton et al. (2019) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6/10 | Good |
Romdhani et al. (2020) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5/10 | Fair |
Ajjimaporn, Ramyarangsi & Siripornpanich (2020) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6/10 | Good |
Petit et al. (2014) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4/10 | Fair |
Blanchfield et al. (2018) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5/10 | Fair |
Boukhris et al. (2019) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6/10 | Good |
Abdessalem et al. (2019) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6/10 | Good |
Hsouna et al. (2019) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6/10 | Good |
Boukhris et al. (2020) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6/10 | Good |