TABLE 1.
HIV dataset | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R‐value | New OTUs in sig. modules | New significant OTUs | Lost significant OTUs | # of significant modules | Total significant features |
0.2 | 74 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 15 |
0.4 | 26 | 5 | 0 | 11 | 17 |
0.65 | 1 | 25 | 0 | 2 | 35 |
Great Lakes dataset | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R‐value | New OTUs in sig. modules | New significant OTUs | Lost significant OTUs | # of significant modules | Total significant features |
0.2 | 139 | 0 | 64 | 1 | 25 |
0.4 | 64 | 3 | 14 | 29 | 33 |
0.65 | 12 | 13 | 6 | 24 | 74 |
Note: MSM was used as the categorical variable for differential abundance in the HIV analysis and the Great Lakes analysis tested for taxa that differed between lakes.