Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 9;10(1):1190–1215. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2022.2150623

Table 6.

Single mediation analysis: indirect effects of theorized mediation variables on usual care.

TCN Effect ‘a’ 95% CI Effect ‘b’ 95% CI Indirect Effect 95% CI % PM
Perceived Susceptibility 0.032 (−0.623, 0.686) 0.118 (0.088, 0.149) 0.004 (−0.075, 0.083) 2.08%
Perceived Severity 0.115 (−0.413, 0.642) 0.013 (−0.028, 0.054) 0.002 (−0.012, 0.019) 0.83%
Response Efficacy 0.015 (−0.556, 0.585) 0.138 (0.102, 0.173) 0.002 (−0.078, 0.082) 1.11%
Self-Efficacy 0.184 (−0.411, 0.78) 0.13 (0.095, 0.164) 0.024 (−0.054, 0.104) 13.25%
HBOC Knowledge −0.051 (−0.554, 0.452) −0.013 (−0.058, 0.032) 0.001 (−0.013, 0.016) 0.36%
Fear of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer 0.047 (−0.117, 0.212) 0.434 (0.309, 0.558) 0.021 (−0.051. 0.095) 11.40%
Cancer Worry–Frequency 0.045 (−0.159, 0.25) 0.148 (0.044, 0.252) 0.007 (−0.025, 0.043) 3.74%
Cancer Worry–Intensity 0.025 (−0.369, 0.419) 0.086 (0.032. 0.14) 0.002 (−0.034, 0.04) 1.20%
Fatalism and Destiny 0.143 (−0.283, 0.569) 0.023 (−0.028, 0.073) 0.003 (−0.011, 0.024) 1.79%
CGRA Intentions UC Direct Effect 95% CI  
  0.18 (−0.045, 0.405)