Table 7.

Single mediation analysis: indirect effects of theorized mediation variables on targeted print.

TP	Effect ‘a’	95% CI	Effect ‘b’	95% CI	Indirect Effect	95% CI	% PM
Perceived Susceptibility	0.41	(−0.239, 1.059)	0.099	(0.067, 0.13)	0.04	(−0.023, 0.11)	17.42%
Perceived Severity	−0.185	(−0.678, 0.309)	0.01	(−0.034, 0.053)	−0.002	(−0.02, 0.012)	0.77%
Response Efficacy	−0.033	(−0.563, 0.497)	0.131	(0.093, 0.17)	−0.004	(−0.076, 0.066)	1.86%
Self-Efficacy	0.162	(−0.465, 0.789)	0.14	(0.109, 0.172)	0.023	(−0.066, 0.113)	9.78%
HBOC Knowledge	0.374	(−0.121, 0.87)	0.064	(0.018, 0.11)	0.024	(−0.007, 0.068)	10.30%
Fear of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer	0.149	(−0.019, 0.317)	0.371	(0.248, 0.493)	0.055	(−0.007, 0.125)	23.74%
Cancer Worry–Frequency	−0.043	(−0.247, 0.161)	0.183	(0.079, 0.287)	−0.008	(−0.05, 0.031)	3.38%
Cancer Worry–Intensity	0.287	(−0.087, 0.662)	0.076	(0.019, 0.134)	0.022	(−0.006, 0.063)	9.45%
Fatalism and Destiny	0.054	(−0.393, 0.501)	−0.028	(−0.076, 0.02)	−0.002	(−0.022, 0.016)	0.66%
CGRA Intentions	TP Direct Effect	95% CI
	0.232*	(0.008, 0.456)

Note: %PM = Percent mediation effects contribute to the direct effect.

*p < 0.05.

**p < 0.01.

***p < 0.001.