Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 13;20:75. doi: 10.1186/s12959-022-00438-3

Table 2.

Standard thromboelastometric tests in patients with chronic liver disease and healthy controls (anova with bonferroni adjustment)

Healthy Controls (CON; a; N = 21 Acute Decompensation (AD; b; N = 20 Acute-On-Chronic Liver Disease
(ACLF; c; N = 10
P-values

EXTEM

(Reference Ranges)

 CT (38–79 s) 55 (51–60) 62 (56–74) 71 (64–77)  < 0.05, a vs. b and c
 CFT (34–159 s) 80 (72–92) 146 (100–181) 139 (94–214)  < 0.05, a vs. b and c
 TT20 (CT + CFT) 141 (126–149) 221 (159–255) 205 (168–281)  < 0.01, a vs. b and c
 ALPHA (63–83˚) 74 (71–75) 67 (59–74) 65 (56–71)  < 0.05, a vs. b and c
 A5 48 (43–52) 32 (28–38) 30 (19–39)  < 0.01, a vs. b and c
 A10 (43–65 mm) 58 (54–60) 43 (37–48) 44 (35–54)  < 0.01, a vs. b and c
 MCF (50–72 mm) 65 (63–67) 52 (48–57) 53 (46–57)  < 0.01, a vs. b and c
 G 9108 (8534–10,267) 5402 (4661–6759) 5923 (4476–7880)  < 0.01, a vs. b and c
 TPI 2.33 (1.82–2.81) 0.69 (0.53–1.30) 0.84 (0.42–1.37)  < 0.01, a vs. b and c

INTEM

(Reference Ranges)

 CT (100–240 s) 182 (167–184) 190 (163–218) 215 (194–247) ns
 CFT (30–110 s) 67 (61–83) 138 (103–172) 136 (93–213)  < 0.01, a vs. b and c
 TT20 (CT + CFT) 255 (239–275) 326 (306–349) 369 (312–442)  < 0.01, a vs. b and c
 ALPHA (70–83˚) 76 (73–77) 67 (60–71) 62 (55–70)  < 0.01, a vs. b and c
 A5 46 (42–49) 33 (28–37) 32 (24–38)  < 0.01, a vs. b and c
 A10 (44–66 mm) 57 (54–59) 43 (37–47) 41 (33–47)  < 0.01, a vs. b and c
 MCF (50–72 mm) 62 (61–65) 50 (45–56) 51 (43–55)  < 0.01, a vs. b and c
 G 8322 (7988–9442) 5278 (4313–6558) 5192 (3918–6360) ns
 TPI 2.43 (1.79–3.04) 0.72 (0.51–1.11) 0.80 (0.35–1.30)  < 0.01, a vs. b and c
 CT-Ratio (INTEM/HEPTEM) 1.04 (0.95–1.08) 0.96 (0.89–1.07) 1.03(1.01–1.25) ns

FIBTEM

(Reference Ranges)

 CT 52 (49–57) 61 (50–67) 61 (51–77) ns
 A5 16 (12–17) 14 (10–16) 10 (8–14) ns
 A10 (7–23 mm) 16 (13–19) 14 (11–16) 10 (8–16) ns
 MCF (9–25 mm) 17 (14–19) 15 (12–18) 11 (9–17) ns
Velocity parameter
 EXTEM AUC 6446 (6263–6731) 5152 (4777–5692) 5405 (4705–6049)  < 0.01, a vs. b and c
 EXTEM maxV 15 (13–17) 11 (8–14) 10 (8–14)  < 0.01, a vs. b and c
 EXTEM maxV-t 103 (73–118) 92 (63–145) 105 (85–129) ns
 FIBTEM AUC 1699 (1409–2161) 1532 (1206–1817) 1095 (965–1601) ns
 FIBTEM maxV 14 (11–16) 10 (8–16) 8 (6–11) ns
 FIBTEM maxV-t 58 (53–69) 66 (61–77) 72 (60–80) ns
 INTEM AUC 6257 (6082–6427) 5178 (4662–5687) 5241 (4395–5618)  < 0.01, a vs. b and c
 INTEM maxV 18 (15–20) 11 (9–13) 10 (7–13)  < 0.01, a vs. b and c
 INTEM maxV-t 205 (193–224) 205 (180–243) 254 (214–288) 0.05, b vs. c
Fibrinoliysis parameter
 EXTEM LI30 (94–100%) 100 (100–100) 100 (100–100) 100 (100–100) ns
 EXTEM LI45 97 (96–98) 99 (96–100) 100 (99–100)  < 0.05 a vs. c
 EXTEMLI60 (86–100%) 93 (90–96) 96 (91–98) 99 (96–100)  < 0.05 a vs. c
 EXTEM ML (< 15% at 60 min after CT) 7.0 (4.0–9.0) 4.0 (2.0–8.5) 1.0 (0.0–3.2)  < 0.05 a vs. c
 FIBTEM LI30 100 (100–100) 100 (99–100) 100 (97–100) ns
 FIBTEM LI45 100 (100–100) 100 (98–100) 100 (97–100) ns
 FIBTEM LI60 100 (99–100) 100 (97–100) 100 (96–100) ns
 FIBTEM ML 0 (0–0.5) 0 (0–2.5) 0 (0–3.5) ns
 ΔLI60 (FIBTEM – EXTEM) 6(4–9) 2.5(1–6.7) 0.5(-2.7–3.2)  < 0.05 a vs. c