Table 4.
Results of ML analysis (eight methods) of BPW indices for discriminating between robust + no-MetS and possible sarcopenia (dynapenia + presarcopenia + sarcopenia).
| Accuracy | SVM | MLP | GNB | DT | RF | LR | LDA | KNN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 62.87 | 62.64 | 56.45 | 58.87 | 66.72 | 61.66 | 77.51 | 64.23 |
| 2 | 63.42 | 58.13 | 50.51 | 61.17 | 68.17 | 55.25 | 76.34 | 57.98 |
| 3 | 74.57 | 68.29 | 56.10 | 62.29 | 70.86 | 72.29 | 71.05 | 55.33 |
| Average | 66.95 | 63.02 | 54.35 | 60.77 | 68.58 | 63.07 | *74.97 | 59.18 |
| AUC | SVM | MLP | GNB | DT | RF | LR | LDA | KNN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.52 | 0.56 | 0.58 | 0.53 | 0.61 | 0.54 | 0.76 | 0.61 |
| 2 | 0.56 | 0.54 | 0.51 | 0.59 | 0.65 | 0.49 | 0.75 | 0.57 |
| 3 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.59 |
| Average | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.64 | 0.57 | *0.74 | 0.59 |
The accuracy is in %. The accuracy and AUC values are listed for the threefold cross validation. Asterisks indicate the highest average value. Both accuracy and AUC were highest for LDA.