Table 13.
Summary of comparative results for 3−BTD
| Algorithm | × 1 | × 2 | Best | Worst | Average | SD | FEs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IDMO | 0.219498 | 0.188424 | 106.93 | 106.93 | 106.93 | 4.85E−05 | 250 |
| DMO [32] | 0.219515 | 0.188373 | 106.93 | 106.93 | 106.93 | 3.01E−14 | 500 |
| AOA [32] | 0.224256 | 0.192452 | 106.93 | 107.16 | 106.97 | 0.045939 | 45,000 |
| GA [77] | 0.788915 | 0.407569 | 263.89589 | 264.82081 | 263.96804 | 1.66862E—01 | 50,000 |
| PSO [77] | 0.788669 | 0.408265 | 263.89584 | 264.5849 | 263.95741 | 1.36897E—01 | 50,000 |
| ICA [77] | 0.788625 | 0.408389 | 263.89585 | 263.91413 | 263.89933 | 4.11693E—03 | 50,000 |
| CS [93] | 0.78867 | 0.40902 | 263.97156 | NA | 264.0669 | 9.00000E—05 | 15,000 |
| WCA [78] | 0.788651 | 0.408316 | 263.89584 | 263.8962 | 263.8959 | 8.71000E—05 | 5250 |
| GWO [77] | 0.788648 | 0.408325 | 263.89601 | 263.90422 | 263.89796 | 1.61422E—03 | 50,000 |
| WSA [77] | 0.788683 | 0.408227 | 263.89584 | 263.89743 | 263.89607 | 3.11960E—04 | 50,000 |
| CGO [94] | NA | NA | 263.89584 | 263.89601 | 263.89585 | 2.51E—05 | 100,000 |
| AOS [96] | NA | NA | 263.89584 | 263.89585 | 263.89584 | 8.26E—09 | 100,000 |
| SNS [84] | 0.7886847 | 0.4082211 | 263.89584 | 263.89586 | 263.89585 | 3.31056E—06 | 4800 |