Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 5;10:e14400. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14400

Table 1. Proportion of amniocentesis indicators and abnormal detection rates in each group by karyotyping and CNV-seq.

Indicators for prenatal diagnosis Constituent rate (No. of cases/total cases) Abnormal detection rate
AMA 27.86% (229/822) 11.79% (27/229)
Maternal serum screening high-risk 17.64% (145/822) 15.17% (22/145)
Abnormal fetal ultrasonography 39.29% (323/822) 13.93% (45/323)
History of adverse reproductive outcomes 16.42% (135/822) 8.89% (12/135)
NIPT high-risk 7.06% (58/822) 37.93% (22/58)*
Mixed indicators 8.76% (72/822) 20.83% (15/72)**
Single indicator 83.45% (686/822) 13.85% (95/686)
≥2 indicators 16.55% (136/822) 17.65% (24/136)
Total 100% (822/822) 14.48% (119/822)

Notes.

AMA
advanced maternal age
NIPT
non-invasive prenatal testing
*

NIPT vs AMA, P < 0.0001; NIPT vs maternal serum screening high-risk, P = 0.0004; NIPT vs abnormal fetal ultrasonography, P < 0.0001; NIPT vs history of adverse reproductive outcomes, P < 0.0001; NIPT vs mixed indicators, P = 0.0317.

**

Mixed indicators vs history of adverse reproductive outcomes, P = 0.0151.