Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 7;10:e14469. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14469

Table 3. Results in division consistency (in %) of calculated muscle endurance ratios into “good” or “poor” ratio between trunk muscles in both groups of tests (n = 68).

Endurance ratio A = B (%) (A = poor) ∩ (B = good) (%) (A = good) ∩ (B = poor) (%) p
FL:EX 60.3 39.7 0 <0.001
R-LM:L-LM 70.6 17.6 11.8 0.503
L-LM:EX 83.8 10.3 5.9 0.549
R-LM:EX 82.3 11.8 5.9 0.338

Note:

A = B – share of unified division into “good” or “poor” ratio in both groups of tests, meaning: ((A = good) ∩ (B = good)) + ((A = poor) ∩ (B = poor)); (A = poor) ∩ (B = good) – share of reverse division in group A and B (resulted as “poor” ratio in tests A and as “good” ratio in tests B); (A = good) ∩ (B = poor) – share of reverse division in group A and B (resulted as “good” ratio in tests A and as “poor” ratio in tests B); p, Exact sig. (2-sided test) (McNemar test).