Table 3. Results in division consistency (in %) of calculated muscle endurance ratios into “good” or “poor” ratio between trunk muscles in both groups of tests (n = 68).
| Endurance ratio | A = B (%) | (A = poor) ∩ (B = good) (%) | (A = good) ∩ (B = poor) (%) | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL:EX | 60.3 | 39.7 | 0 | <0.001 |
| R-LM:L-LM | 70.6 | 17.6 | 11.8 | 0.503 |
| L-LM:EX | 83.8 | 10.3 | 5.9 | 0.549 |
| R-LM:EX | 82.3 | 11.8 | 5.9 | 0.338 |
Note:
A = B – share of unified division into “good” or “poor” ratio in both groups of tests, meaning: ((A = good) ∩ (B = good)) + ((A = poor) ∩ (B = poor)); (A = poor) ∩ (B = good) – share of reverse division in group A and B (resulted as “poor” ratio in tests A and as “good” ratio in tests B); (A = good) ∩ (B = poor) – share of reverse division in group A and B (resulted as “good” ratio in tests A and as “poor” ratio in tests B); p, Exact sig. (2-sided test) (McNemar test).