Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 13;20:396. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02870-1

Table 2.

Comparison of the pathologic findings between the OH and LH groups

Variables OH group (n=78) LH group (n=29) P value
Tumor diameter, cm 5.8±3.0 5.0±2.1 0.177
Major hepatectomy, n (%) 50 (64.1%) 17 (58.6%) 0.602
Tumor number, n (%)
 Single 71 (91.0%) 26 (89.7%) 1.000
 Multiple 7 (9.0%) 3 (10.3%)
Pathological differentiation, n (%)
 Poorly differentiated 17 (21.8%) 3 (10.3%) 0.301
 Moderately differentiated 47 (60.3%) 22 (75.9%)
 Well differentiated 14 (17.9%) 4 (13.8%)
TNM stage, n (%)
 0/IA/IB/II 47 (60.3%) 19 (65.5%) 0.619
 IIIA/IIIB/IV 31 (39.7%) 10 (34.5%)
Lymphatic metastasis, n (%) 16 (20.5%) 2 (6.9%) 0.167
Surgical margin (R0), n (%) 72 (92.3%) 27 (93.1%) 1.000
Satellite foci, n (%) 7 (9.0%) 4 (13.8%) 0.710
Microscopic perineural invasion, n (%) 16 (20.5%) 7 (24.1%) 0.685
Microscopic microvascular invasion, n (%) 16 (20.5%) 6 (20.7%) 0.984

Data are presented as the mean with standard deviation (‾x±SD) or counts with percentages, n (x%)