Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Dec 13.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Mar;176(3):391–393. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.6020

Table.

Unadjusted Percentage of Women Receiving New Osteoporosis Drug Therapy

No. (%)
Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Resulta
Total
No Osteoporosis
Non-Main-Site Osteoporosis
Main-Site Osteoporosis
Age No. New Treatmentb No. New Treatmentb No. New Treatmentb No. New Treatmentb
40-64 y

 Low-risk 3696 (60.1)   913 (24.7) 2246 (60.8) 179 (8.0) 1092 (29.6) 469 (43.0) 358 (9.7) 265 (74.0)

 Elevated risk   927 (15.1)   289 (31.2)   512 (55.2)   52 (10.1)   289 (31.2) 147 (50.9) 126 (13.6)   90 (71.4)

≥65 y 1527 (24.8)   710 (46.5)   505 (33.0)   80 (15.8)   635 (41.6) 345 (54.3) 387 (25.3) 285 (73.6)

Total 6150 (100) 1912 (31.1) 3263 (53.1) 311 (9.5) 2016 (32.8) 961 (47.7) 871 (14.2) 640 (73.5)
a

No osteoporosis indicates all sites normal or osteopenia without osteoporosis; non-main-site osteoporosis indicates lateral lumbar or other site osteoporosis.

b

P < .001 for χ2 test assessing overall difference in percentages of women who received new treatment with drugs by age-risk category.