Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 14;88(23):e01437-22. doi: 10.1128/aem.01437-22

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Visualization of interactions in the GS48 and FSS23 populations using PCA (A and B) and schematic models (C, D, and E). The GS48 and FSS23 majority rule consensus interaction matrices were used as input for the PCA using default settings. (A) First and second component of the PCA analysis of the GS48 interaction matrix. All variation falls within the 95% CI of Bacillus (red line). (B) First and second components of the PCA analysis of the FSS23 interaction matrix. All variation falls within the 95% CI of Bacillus (red line). (C) Explanatory diagram of the meaning of the interactions between different genera in panels D and E. (D) Interaction diagram of the GS48 population. (E) Interaction diagram of the FSS23 population. A, amensal interactions; R, reciprocal interactions. In black are all interactions, and in purple are all exDNase-associated interactions.