Table 4.

Meta-analysis of mental health of cancer LGBT patients.

Author(s) (year)	SMD	[95% Conf. interval]	[95% Conf. interval]	% Weight	Study quality
Rhoten et al. (2022) (94)	12.48	10.05	14.92	0.97	Good
Feit et al. (2022) (95)	20.63	18.5	22.76	1.27	Good
Cheng et al. (2022) (96)	1.60	0.33	2.87	3.57	Good
Waters et al. (2021) (97)	−0.75	−2.23	0.73	2.61	Good
Sutter et al. (2021) (6)	20.25	18.57	21.94	2.02	Good
Skorzewska et al. (2021) (98)	−2.66	−3.96	−1.36	3.4	Moderate
Mulholand et al. (2021) (99)	−1.74	−2.83	−0.66	4.86	Good
Messona et al. (2021) (100)	11.68	10.34	13.02	3.19	Good
Drysdale et al. (2021) (101)	1.63	0.16	3.10	2.65	Good
Desai et al. (2021) (102)	7.88	6.64	9.12	3.76	Good
Cloyes et al. (2021) (103)	1.56	0.08	3.05	2.61	Moderate
Chidiac et al. (2021) (104)	−1.10	−2.60	0.40	2.55	Moderate
Burki et al. (2021) (105)	3.11	2.13	4.09	5.99	Good
Berner et al. (2021) (106)	7.93	6.28	9.58	2.12	Good
Austria et al. (2021) (107)	0.73	−0.55	2.01	3.52	Good
Sutter et al. (2020) (108)	2.08	0.92	3.24	4.25	Good
Sheeham et al. (2020) (109)	17.32	15.50	19.14	1.73	Good
Peitzmeier et al. (2020) (110)	9.36	7.55	11.16	1.76	Good
Ozkara et al. (2020) (111)	−1.63	−3.30	0.03	2.07	Moderate
Mclnnis et al. (2020) (112)	−8.77	−10.18	−7.36	2.9	Good
Kano et al. (2020) (113)	−13.42	−15.53	−11.30	1.29	Good
Haviland et al. (2020) (114)	1.54	0.49	2.59	5.21	Good
Grasso et al. (2020) (115)	0.91	−0.33	2.16	3.71	Good
Cattelan et al. (2020) (116)	8.57	7.29	9.84	3.54	Good
Berner et al. (2020) (117)	5.66	4.25	7.07	2.87	Good
Arnold et al. (2020) (118)	10.98	9.43	12.53	2.4	Good
Stevens et al. (2019) (119)	−7.97	−9.66	−6.29	2.02	Good
Schabath et al. (2019) (120)	20.94	19.03	22.84	1.58	Moderate
Rice et al. (2019) (121)	4.55	3.16	5.94	2.98	Good
Kamen et al. (2019) (122)	2.11	−1.67	2.48	2.99	Good
Cathcart et al. (2019) (123)	−4.59	−6.22	−2.97	2.17	Moderate
Tamargo et al. (2017) (124)	3.20	1.80	4.61	2.91	Good
Russell et al. (2016) (125)	8.14	7.02	9.26	4.57	Good
overall	12.48	10.05	14.92	100

Test of overall effect = 0: z = 268.40, p < 0.0001.