Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 4;256:109017. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109017

Table A.5.

Correlation between the length of stay-at-home orders (days) and counts of 2020 participants 2020 observations, and 2020 percent of observations originating from within urban areas, March–June 2020, for four community science programs.

Program y x Adj r squared F1,49 statistic p value Estimate Standard error
Nature's Notebook 2020 observations Length stay at home (days) −0.01973 0.0327 0.8571
eButterfly 2020 observations Length stay at home (days) −0.01963 0.03732 0.8476
iNaturalist 2020 observations Length stay at home (days) −0.01954 0.04176 0.8389
eBird 2020 observations Length stay at home (days) −0.02041 0.0000615 0.9934
Nature's Notebook 2020 participants Length stay at home (days) −0.01969 0.03467 0.8531
eButterfly 2020 participants Length stay at home (days) 0.03397 2.758 0.1031 −3.305 1.99
iNaturalist 2020 participants Length stay at home (days) −0.01711 0.159 0.6918
eBird 2020 participants Length stay at home (days) −0.0007943 0.9603 0.3319
Nature's Notebook 2020 %urban observations Length stay at home (days) 0.04846 3.547 0.06561 2.788 1.48
eButterfly 2020 %urban observations Length stay at home (days) 0.07229 4.896 0.03161 1.5966 0.7216
iNaturalist 2020 %urban observations Length stay at home (days) −0.01922 0.05694 0.8124
eBird 2020 %urban observations Length stay at home (days) −0.008157 0.5955 0.444