. 2022 Dec 14;228:109924. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109924

Table 1.

Comparison of droplet volume emission rate models for different expiratory activities against experimental data.

	Size range D_dry ( $μ$ m)	Breathing $V_{b r}$ $[\frac{p L}{h}]$	Speaking $V_{s p}$ $[\frac{p L}{h}]$	Singing $V_{s i}$ $[\frac{p L}{h}]$
Model
Bunonano et al. [16]	$\leq 5.5$	157	748	–
Schjiven et al. [[13], [13]]	$\leq 20$	132^a (0–54000)	1080^a (0–54000)	12900^a (930–123000)
Nordsiek et al. [14]	$\leq 20$	–	142	–
Experimental data
Fleischer et al. [446]	$\leq 5$	332	1289	6487
Fleischer et al. [446]	$\leq 20$	332	1390	10963

mean (min-max) computed after running 10 000 Monte Carlo samples.