Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 14;31(1):14. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07501-9

Table 3.

Respondent’s agreement with the with the meaningfulness and usefulness of the refreshed concept statements

ITEMS Strongly agree Agree Somewhat agree Neither agree nor disagree Somewhat disagree Disagree Strongly disagree
n % n % n % n % n % n % n %

1. The concept statements reflect the nuances, complexities, and information required to effectively convey

what cancer supportive care entails or aspires to achieve (n = 37)

14 38 20 54 2 5 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0

2. The concept statements are meaningful and useful to guide best practice

models of cancer supportive care (n = 36)

14 39 19 53 1 3 0 0 1 3 1 3 0 0

3. The concept statements are meaningful and useful to help inform health services of

what implementation of comprehensive supportive care requires (n = 37)

6 16 17 46 10 27 2 5 1 3 0 0 1 3

4. The concept statements are meaningful and useful to help health services

assess quality of their supportive care provision (n = 37)

6 16 18 49 9 24 2 5 1 3 1 3 0 0

5. The concept statements are meaningful and useful to guide future

research endeavours (n = 36)

11 31 13 36 8 22 3 8 1 3 0 0 0 0

6. The concept statements are meaningful and useful to convey/explain supportive

care to patients, carers and family members (n = 37)

9 24 17 46 6 16 0 0 2 5 3 8 0 0

7. The concept statements are meaningful and useful to convey/explain supportive care

to multidisciplinary clinicians (n = 36)

15 42 12 33 5 14 2 6 1 3 1 3 0 0