Table 2.
Volumetric and spatial accuracy between baseline CTP ischemic lesions and follow-up DWI lesions for patients with eTICI 2b-2c vs. eTICI 3
eTICI 2b-2c (n = 29) | eTICI 3 (n = 30) | Total (eTICI 2b-3 [n = 59]) | |
---|---|---|---|
Median baseline ischemic core volume on CTP (mL)–median (IQR) | 13.0 (5.5–32.5) | 20.0 (7.8–47.3) | 16.0 (8.0–47.0) |
Follow-up DWI infarct volume (mL)–median (IQR) | 17.7 (5.6–69.0) | 10.1 (5.1–37.3) | 10.8 (5.5–42.2) |
Median volumetric difference (mL)–median (IQR) |
6 (−10 to 47) 17 (7.2–68.7) |
−3 (−19 to 5) 13.3 (3.7–43.8) |
0 (−12; 21) 16.3 (5.8–48.2) |
Median Dice similarity coefficient–median (IQR) | 0.12 (0.00–0.35) | 0.20 (0.03–0.36) | 0.20 (0.01–0.35) |
Median positive predictive value–median (IQR) | 0.34 (0.12–0.44) | 0.27 (0.12–0.52) | 0.30 (0.13–0.47) |
CTP CT perfusion, DWI diffusion-weighted imaging, eTICI expanded Treatment in Cerebral Infarction, IQR interquartile range