Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov;84(4):848–856. doi: 10.18999/nagjms.84.4.848

Table.

Comparison of clinical characteristics and treatment factors between the 2 surgical approaches

Characteristics / Factors Group; mean ± SD or no. (%) p value
Successful TULAA
Group (n=142)
CLA Group
(n=126)
Age (years) 11.3 ± 3.4 10.6 ± 3.2 0.085a
BMI (kg/m2) 16.5 ± 2.2 16.8 ± 2.0 0.246a
Gender
Male 68 (47.89%) 61 (48.41%) 0.932b
Female 74 (52.11%) 65 (51.59%)
Operation time (mins) 28.5 ± 10.5 42.5 ± 10.7 <0.001a
Time for postoperative ambulation (hours) 8.5 ± 1.5 12.5 ± 2.0 <0.001a
Postoperative exhaustion time (hours) 10.5 ± 5.5 16.8 ± 6.8 <0.001a
Hospitalization expenses (RMB) 6290.5 ± 58.5 7381.5 ± 60.5 <0.001a
Postoperative complications 2 (1.41%) 1 (0.79%) >0.999c
Surgical wound effusion 1 0 /
Intra-abdominal abscess 1 0 /
Surgical wound infection 0 1 /

TULAA: transumbilical extracorporeal laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy

CLA: conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy

BMI: body mass index

*p values: a=Student’s t-test, b=Chi-square test, c=Fisher’s exact test.