Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 12;12(12):e063525. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063525

Table 4.

Absolute risk reductions and numbers needed to be vaccinated (NNVs) in geographical regions with different baseline risks, population-based data Hospitalisations

A. County or state B. Active cases per 100 000 population* C. Calculated hospitalisations per 100 000 (estimated at 6.86% of cases) (B×6.86%)† D. Calculated hospitalisations per 100 000 (expressed as %)=baseline risk (C/100 000) (%) E. Calculated risk of hospitalisation after vaccine with 95% or 66% effectiveness (RRR 95% or 66%) (D×5% or 34%) (%)‡ F. Absolute risk reduction (D−E) (%) G. Number needed to be vaccinated
May 2021
Los Angeles, California 270.43 18.55 0.02 0.00 0.02 (0.00 to 0.03) 5000 (3464 to 8983)
Hampshire, Massachusetts 251 17.22 0.02 0.00 0.02 (0.00 to 0.03) 5000 (3464 to 8983)
Putnam, New York 164 11.25 0.01 0.00 0.01 (0.00 to 0.02) 10 000 (6146 to 26 815)
De Baca, New Mexico 1124.74 77.16 0.08 0.01 0.07 (0.05 to 0.09) 1429 (1126 to 1953)
McKinley, New Mexico 730.89 50.14 0.05 0.00 0.05 (0.04 to 0.06) 2000 (1562 to 2779)
Catron, New Mexico 80.95 5.55 0.01 0.00 0.01 (0.00 to 0.02) 10 000 (6146 to 26 815)
Ladakh state, India 6250 428.75 0.43 0.02 0.41 (0.37 to 0.45) 244 (221 to 272)
Uttar Pradesh state, India 833 57.14 0.06 0.00 0.06 (0.05 to 0.08) 1667 (1327 to 2239)
Kerala state, India 7143 490.01 0.49 0.02 0.47 (0.43 to 0.52) 213 (194 to 235)
September 2021
Los Angeles, California 472 32.38 0.03 0.01 0.02 (0.01 to 0.03) 5000 (3073 to 13 406)
Hampshire, Massachusetts 228 15.64 0.02 0.01 0.01 (0.00 to 0.01) 10000 (4794 to –116 171)
Putnam, New York 341 23.39 0.02 0.01 0.01 (0.00 to 0.01) 10000 (4794 to –116 171)
De Baca, New Mexico 409 28.06 0.03 0.01 0.02 (0.01 to 0.03) 5000 (3073 to 13 406)
McKinley, New Mexico 517 35.47 0.04 0.01 0.03 (0.02 to 0.04) 3333 (2272 to 6258)
Catron, New Mexico 405 27.78 0.03 0.01 0.02 (0.01 to 0.03) 5000 (3073 to 13 406)
Ladakh state, India 28 1.92 0.00 0.00 0 (0.00 to 0.00)
Uttar Pradesh state, India 14 0.96 0.00 0.00 0 (0.00 to 0.00)
Kerala state, India 1204 82.59 0.08 0.03 0.05 (0.03 to 0.07) 2000 (1413 to 3424)

95% CIs shown in parentheses. CIs that include negative numbers or infinity indicate non-significant differences in harm between the intervention and control groups. Such intervals do not necessarily include the point estimates and reflect a range from beneficial to harmful effects of the intervention.28

*Sources: Johns Hopkins dashboard (https://www.arcgis.com/apps/MapSeries/index.html?appid=ad46e587a9134fcdb43ff54c16f8c39b) (accessed 5 September 2021); New York Times dashboard (https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/world/asia/india-coronavirus-cases.html)(accessed 23 May 2021 and 5 September 2021).

†Estimate of percentage of infections that require hospitalisation (infection hospitalisation rate (IHR)), based on the upper limit of 6.86% in published research.40 41 Further explanation in text. Online supplement table 4 presents a sensitivity analysis assuming an IHR based on the lower limit of 2.10% in published research.

‡Reported effectiveness of the most effective vaccines (RRR) decreased from the range of 95% during May 2021 to the range of 66% during September 2021, based mainly on the emergence of the Delta variant.57

RRR, relative risk reduction.