Skip to main content
. 2022 May 10;24(1):140–160. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxac015

Table 2.

Average estimated metabolite concentrations for 200 iterations in the simulation at an increasing shifting variations from Inline graphic ppm to Inline graphic ppm across proposed method, Lasso, elastic net, and adaptive Lasso. Corresponding standard deviations are recorded in parentheses

  Truth Inline graphic Inline graphic 0.01ppm Inline graphic 0.02ppm Inline graphic 0.03ppm Inline graphic 0.04ppm
  1 Inline graphic 0.970 (0.106) 0.984 (0.067) 0.968 (0.152) 0.939 (0.228)
Proposed method 1 Inline graphic 0.924 (0.218) 0.953 (0.167) 0.948 (0.184) 0.940 (0.213)
  1 Inline graphic 0.903 (0.274) 0.946 (0.201) 0.946 (0.199) 0.926 (0.251)
  1 Inline graphic 0.017 (0.055) 0.008 (0.034) 0.007 (0.040) 0.002 (0.006)
Lasso 1 Inline graphic 0.725 (0.396) 0.850 (0.309) 0.925 (0.210) 0.859 (0.319)
  1 Inline graphic 0.755 (0.389) 0.867 (0.298) 0.938 (0.194) 0.868 (0.314)
  1 Inline graphic 0.111 (0.223) 0.064 (0.193) 0.060 (0.195) 0.032 (0.135)
Elastic net 1 Inline graphic 0.970 (0.030) 0.975 (0.030) 0.980 (0.023) 0.982 (0.023)
  1 Inline graphic 0.978 (0.020) 0.981 (0.024) 0.984 (0.020) 0.986 (0.019)
  1 Inline graphic 0.060 (0.210) 0.041 (0.180) 0.044 (0.188) 0.019 (0.123)
Adaptive Lasso 1 Inline graphic 0.770 (0.350) 0.873 (0.280) 0.916 (0.023) 0.911 (0.243)
  1 Inline graphic 0.810 (0.320) 0.900 (0.240) 0.928 (0.217) 0.926 (0.217)