1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13
1. Study cohort	–	0.96	−0.001	0.03	0.01	0.01	<−0.001	0.06	0.09	0.04	−0.01	0.10	0.05
2. Age		–	−0.04	−0.02	0.02	0.02	0.004	0.07	0.09	0.04	0.001	0.09	0.04
3. Sex			–	−0.04	−0.04	−0.08	0.07	−0.36	0.003	0.05	−0.37	−0.04	−0.03
4. Family SES				–	−0.04	0.01	−0.01	−0.04	−0.01	−0.02	−0.06	0.01	.002
5. Age 21 homelessness					–	−0.02	−0.22	0.19	0.03	0.01	0.28	0.04	−0.10
6. Age 23 homelessness						–	−0.01	−0.002	0.35	0.05	0.01	0.37	0.09
7. Age 25 homelessness							–	−0.14	−0.02	0.43	−0.01	−0.16	0.45
8. Age 21 antisocial behaviour								–	0.01	−0.05	0.65	0.07	−0.01
9. Age 23 antisocial behaviour									–	0.05	0.01	0.70	−0.07
10. Age 25 Antisocial behaviour										–	−0.04	−0.003	0.53
11. Age 21 violence victimisation											–	0.03	−0.07
12. Age 23 violence victimisation												–	−0.003

Statistically significant associations in bold (at least p < .05). Homelessness, antisocial behaviour and violence victimisation (coded 0 = no, 1 = yes). Sex (coded 0 = male, 1 = female). Point biserial correlations were performed between a dichotomous variable and a continuous variable. Tetrachoric correlations were performed between two dichotomous variables. Pearson correlations were performed between two continuous variables.