Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 13;22:2336. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14503-z

Table 2.

Mothers’ exposure to promotion or messages at the health care facility, mass media, or other source related to any breast-milk substitutes or companies selling these products, by country (%)a

Chile (n = 451) Ecuador (n = 330) Mexico (n = 693) Nigeria (n = 330) Panama (n = 330) Philippines (n = 330) Thailand (n = 330) Uruguay (n = 330) Totalb (n = 3124)
Heard and/or seen a promotion or message at
Promotion in general 86.7 82.4 84.4 18.0 70.6 43.9 83.0 42.2 63.9
Health facilityc 3.8 2.7 3.3 - 4.5 - - 3.2 -
Promotion outside health facilities 82.9 79.7 81.1 18.0 66.1 43.9 83.0 39.0 61.7
Television 58.3 - 69.1 - - - - 32.0 -
Magazine 6.2 - 5.2 - - - - 1.0 -
Social media 17.1 - 3.7 - - - - 8.0 -
Retail outlets or pharmacies 31.9 - 26.2 - - - - 4.0 -
Received at least one
Sample of any baby milk product 4.7 10.0 10.9 1.2 14.0 1.2 14.2 3.0 7.4
Coupon of any baby milk product 2.9 13.0 1.6 0.3 1.5 0 6.7 1.2 3.4
Any gifts from someone other than a family member or a friend that may promote the use of a product coveredd 34.1 17.6 8.5 2.7 24.8 1.5 16.0 6.9 14.0

aDisaggregated data from Ecuador, Nigeria, Panama, Philippines, and Thailand related to promotion outside health facilities are not included, as the reports used a different denominator than the total number of women

bEstimates totals are calculated only when all eight countries contributed data

cIncludes maternity health facilities and public primary health facilities

dIncludes bottles, diapers, clothing, breast shields, baskets, backpacks, utensils, pacifiers, toys, and checkbooks