Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 14;22:2347. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14509-7

Table 4.

Adherence to four individual health-protective behaviours at period 1 and period 2. Full GEE model containing all predictor variables adjusted for time, N = 1622

Adherence to washing regularly hands QIC = 449.58 Adherence to wearing mask indoors QIC = 281.71 Adherence to maintaining the recommended physical distance QIC = 483.139 Adherence to carrying own disinfectant QIC = 460.13
B [95% CI] p B [95% CI] P B [95% CI] p B [95% CI] p
Female sex (vs other) 0.15 [0.09, -0.20] < 0.001 0.04 [-0.01, 0.08] 0.095 0.07 [0.02, 0.12] 0.005 0.29 [0.24, -0.34]  < 0.001
White ethnicity (vs other) -0.06 [-0.18, 0.06] 0.302 -0.10 [-0.17, -0.02] 0.051 -0.03 [-0.14, 0.09] 0.656 -0.10 [-0.21, 0.01] 0.068
No post-16 qualification (vs yes) 0.10 [0.02, -0.17] 0.009 -0.03 [-0.09, 0.04] 0.397 0.04 [-0.03, 0.11] 0.297 0.05 [-0.03, 0.12] 0.248
Other country of residence (vs England) -0.01 [-0.08, 0.06] 0.832 -0.19 [-0.26,—0.12] < 0.001 -0.02 [-0.09, 0.04] 0.463 -0.01 [-0.08, 0.06] 0.739
Not being a key worker (vs yes) 0.01 [-0.05, 0.07] 0.784 0.004 [-0.05, 0.05] 0.988 0.03 [-0.03–0.08] 0.328 0.07 [0.02, 0.13] 0.013
Living alone (vs not) 0.01 [-0.07, 0.08] 0.890 -0.0001[-0.0004, 0.0002] 0.402 0.03 [-0.04, 0.10] 0.380 -0.04 [-0.12, 0.04] 0.323
Not living with vulnerable people (vs yes) -0.06 [-0.11, 0.003] 0.063 -0.00001[-0.00003, 0.00001] 0.390 -0.08 [-0.14–0.03] 0.004 -0.05 [-0.11, 0.01] 0.095
Income < £50,000 (vs ≥ £50,000) -0.07 [-0.12, -0.01] 0.013 0.00002[-0.00003, 0.0001] 0.491 -0.07 [-0.12, -0.02] 0.006 0.01 [-0.04, 0.06] 0.788
Income ‘Prefer not to say’ (vs ≥ £50,000) -0.04 [-0.13, 0.05] 0.410 0.00001 [-0.0001, 0.0001] 0.731 -0.05 [-0.13, 0.03] 0.235 0.02 [-0.07, 0.12] 0.629
Non-smoker (vs smoker) -0.001 [-0.07, 0.07] 0.983 0.00003 [-0.0001, 0.0002] 0.618 0.02 [-0.05, 0.09] 0.655 -0.003 [-0.08, 0.07] 0.927
Obese/overweight (vs other) 0.01 [-0.04, 0.06] 0.665 -0.00004 [-0.0001, 0.0001] 0.453 0.01 [-0.04, 0.05] 0.756 0.03 [-0.02, 0.08] 0.201
No health problems (vs yes) -0.03 [-0.08, 0.03] 0.320 0.02 [-0.03, 0.06] 0.553 -0.03 [-0.08, 0.02] 0.203 0.02 [-0.03, 0.07] 0.501
Not perceived high risk of COVID-19 (vs yes) -0.07 [-0.13, -0.02] 0.006 -0.00001 [-0.00004, 0.00002] 0.312 -0.14 [-0.19, -0.10] < 0.001 -0.15 [-0.20,—0.09] < 0.001
Not diagnosed/ suspected COVID-19 (vs yes) 0.02 [-0.04, 0.08] 0.535 0.00003 [-0.00003, 0.0001] 0.270 0.01 [-0.05–0.06] 0.821 0.01 [-0.05, 0.07] 0.796
Age 0.02 [0.003, 0.04] 0.021 0.01 [-0.01, 0.02] 0.323 0.05 [0.04–0.07] < 0.001 0.01 [-0.01, 0.03] 0.194
Quality of life 0.001 [-0.03, 0.03] 0.952 -0.0001 [-0.00001, 0.00001] 0.094 -0.03 [-0.06, -0.01] 0.006 0.01 [-0.01, 0.04] 0.359
Experience of social distancing -0.0001 [-0.001, 0.0004] 0.667 -0.0000001 [-0.00001, 0.00001-] 0.789 0.0001 [-0.0002, 0.0004] 0.460 -0.0001 [-0.0004, 0.0002] 0.532

Models also included Time as a covariate. No significant time*predictor interaction improved the model, QIC is a relative (lower is better) measure of goodness of fit, Bold indicates statistical significance. Β Beta parameter, CI Confidence interval. Social distancing 1319 participants, 1888 cases included (1356 excluded = 3244)