Table 11.

Performance comparison for Covid-19 detection. Also, Covid-19 positive cases are provided.

Authors	Dataset size	Performance (in %)
		ACC	AUC	SPEC	SEN
Das et al. (2020) [14]	18,524 CXRs: Covid-19 (972)	98.77	99.00	99.00	95.00
Togaçar et al. (2020) [17]	458 CXRs: Covid-19 (295)	97.78	–	95.74	98.86
Minaee et al. (2020) [19]	5,420 CXRs: Covid-19 (420)	98.00	–	95.80	91.00
Ozturk et al. (2020) [21]	1,127 CXRs: Covid-19 (127)	98.08	–	95.30	95.13
Chowdhury et al. (2020) [23]	3,487 CXRs: Covid-19 (423)	99.70	100.00	99.55	99.70
Aradhya et al. (2021) [13]	306 CXRs: Covid-19 (69)	79.76	–	–	–
Ismael et al. (2021) [25]	380 CXRs: Covid-19 (180)	92.63	–	–	–
Narin et al. (2021) [18]	14,194 CXRs: Covid-19 (341)	96.01	–	96.60	91.80
Mukherjee et al. (2021) [15]	336 CXRs: Covid-19 (168)	95.83	97.31	98.21	93.45
Mukherjee et al. (2021) [16]	260 CXRs: Covid-19 (130)	96.92	99.22	100.00	94.20
Bassi & Attux (2021) [20]	2,064 CXRs: Covid-19 (439)	100.00	–	99.98	99.99
Hussain et al. (2021) [22]	7,390 CXRs: Covid-19 (2,843)	99.12	–	97.36	95.36
Rahman et al. (2021) [24]	18,479 CXRs: Covid-19 (3,616)	99.65	100.00	95.59	94.56
Proposed DNN	2,541 CXRs: Covid-19 (1,200)	99.87	100.00	100.00	100.00