Table 2.
Summary evaluation of strengths and weaknesses of the models evaluated in this study.
| Model | Benefits | Drawbacks | Rat- ing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Delloitte Model Renjen et al.[5,6,11] | Clear roadmap Address human and institutional factors Provides a tangible timeframe with clear reference points |
Can be become overly complicated Danger of rigidity and protocolisation |
* |
| UK Military Model JDP 01 (8) | Conceptually easy to implement Engages multiple resources Well tested in real world scenarios Adaptive and reactive Robust ensuring antifragility and sustain- ability |
Limited focus on tech- nology and artificial in- telligence | ** |
| McKinsey Model Atsmon et al.(9) Hirt et al.(10) | Explores the entire timeframe of crisis Builds on established successful models Simple and transferable concepts An exemplar of building upon earlier success by other organisations |
Difficult to enact on global level Does not exploit the benefits of advancing technology |
*** |