Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 12;71(12):2552–2556. doi: 10.2337/db22-0448

Table 3.

Comparisons in T2 signal ratios between the GDM ≤26 and GDM >26 groups versus the no GDM group

GDM ≤26 group GDM >26 group
Ratio and model β-Coefficient (SE) P β-Coefficient (SE) P
MBH:AMY
 0 0.0626 (0.0338) 0.07*** −0.0044 (0.0276) 0.89
 1 0.0641 (0.0342) 0.06*** −0.0042 (0.0279) 0.88
 2 0.0707 (0.036) 0.05*** −0.0055 (0.0281) 0.84
 3 0.0715 (0.0364) 0.05*** −0.0058 (0.0288) 0.84
MBH:WM
 0 0.1337 (0.0634) 0.04 0.014 (0.0518) 0.79
 1 0.1384 (0.0642) 0.03 0.0167 (0.0525) 0.75
 2 0.1508 (0.0679) 0.03 0.141 (0.0528) 0.79
 3 0.1477 (0.0683) 0.03 0.0153 (0.053) 0.77
AMY:WM
 0 0.0187 (0.0311) 0.55 0.0227 (0.0254) 0.37
 1 0.021 (0.0313) 0.50 0.0258 (0.0256) 0.32
 2 0.02 (0.0332) 0.55 0.026 (0.0258) 0.32
 3 0.0164 (0.0332) 0.62 0.0273 (0.0257) 0.29

Model 0, no adjustment; model 1, adjusted for child’s age and sex; model 2: adjusted for child’s age and sex and maternal prepregnancy BMI; model 3, adjusted for child’s age and sex, maternal prepregnancy BMI, and child’s BMI z score.

Reference: no GDM group.

***

P < 0.05; value shows a trend toward significance.