Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 14;12:21586. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26124-y

Table 2.

Values of RAI obtained by the ratio between the maximum value measured in case study the area and the background value over different areas in the world.

Author Area Fault type Maximum value Background value RAI
This study Pusteria valley —Periadriatic fault system Transpressive fault 816 kBq m−3 50 kBq m−3 16
Ciotoli et al.7 Fucino plain—SBGMF Normal fault 119 kBq m−3 25 kBq m−3 5
Zhou et al.40 Tibet—Lhasa Normal fault 87.4 kBq m−3 7.6 kBq m−3 11
Li et al.41 Yanhuai basin, Hebei undefined 57.8 kBq m−3 8.1 kBq m−3 7
Yao and Wang42 Jixian mountain, Tianjing undefined 58.6 kBq m−3 3.2 kBq m−3 18
Zhou et al.43 Haiyuan, Ningxia undefined 38.3 kBq m−3 5.8 kBq m−3 7
Seminsky et al.11 Baikal-Mongolian sesismic belt—Khustai fault Normal fault 20.2 kBq m−3 3.9 kBq m−3 5
Wang et al.16 North China—Tangshan area Normal fault 38.4 kBq m−3 4.7 kBq m−3 8
Chen et al.13 Capital of China—KQF fault undefined 206.7 kBq m−3 11.6 kBq m−3 18
Xuan et al.44 Thua Thien Hue (Vietnam)—Dak Rong-Hue fault undefined 144.5 kBq m−3 24.8 kBq m−3 6