Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 1;13:1035418. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1035418

Table 4.

ROC analysis of indices in predicting the risk of MAFLD in different groups.

Indexes AUC 95%CI Sensitivity(%) Specificity(%) Youden index Cutoff points
MAFLD
FLI 0.879 * (0.857,0.898) 88.57 72.31 0.6088 0.915
LAP 0.873 * (0.851,0.892) 86.15 72.54 0.5869 56.505
BMI 0.836 (0.812,0.858) 84.38 65.90 0.5028 25.391
Obesity
MAFLD
ZJU index 0.816 * (0.786,0.844) 71.12 80.33 0.5145 39.139
LAP 0.796 * (0.765,0.826) 64.01 82.79 0.4680 50.700
BMI 0.748 (0.715,0.780) 62.50 72.54 0.3504 27.143
Lean MAFLD
ZJU index 0.952 * (0.912,0.978) 88.89 89.47 0.7836 33.706
WTI 0.920 (0.872,0.954) 80.56 89.47 0.7003 120.120
BMI 0.890 (0.836,0.931) 86.11 83.55 0.6966 22.477
T2DM MAFLD
BRI 0.963 (0.921,0.986) 81.82 100.00 0.8182 4.970
FLI 0.958 (0.915,0.983) 90.91 87.80 0.7871 2.071
BMI 0.953 (0.909,0.980) 96.69 78.05 0.7474 25.992

The predictive abilities of indicators were analyzed by ROC.

compared with BMI in respective subgroups, *P < 0.05.

MAFLD, metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; AUC, areas under the curve; CI, confidence interval; FLI, fatty liver index; LAP, lipid accumulation product; BMI, body mass index; ZJU index, Zhejiang University index; WTI, waist triglyceride index; BRI, body roundness index.