Table 3.
Comparison of the covalent and non-covalent conjugation strategies in bioconjugation processes and possible interactions between biomolecules and nanoparticle’s surface in bioconjugation process [96, 176, 180–182]
Non-covalent interactions | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|
Spontaneous absorption of biomolecules onto the surface of stabilised NPs |
• Convenient and simple • Do not require any additional chemical components • Most useful in understanding physicochemical interactions at the nano–bio interface • Used to reduce non-specific reactions and aggregation • Affinity-based receptor-ligand systems provide strong bonds with high binding affinity to cells and resistance to: o pH; o Temperature variations; o Denaturants |
• Random orientation of proteins reducing its activity • Necessity of a high concentration of biomolecules for the preparation of biomolecule–gold particle conjugates • Difficult control over biological response due to the bioconjugate is mainly formed by electrostatic attractions • The binding is greatly influenced by changes in: o pH; o Ionic strength e.g., increasing the electrolyte concentration shields the attractive electrostatic interaction causing the desorption of biomolecules • Possible displacement by other molecules on the NPs surface specially in complex biological samples • Washing buffers can remove loosely bound proteins and reduce non-specific interactions |
Electrostatic interactions Positively charged groups in biomolecules are attracted by the negative charged surface of the metal NPs or vice versa | ||
Hydrophobic interactions Attraction between hydrophobic parts of the biomolecule and the metal nanoparticle surface. | ||
Chemisorption Donation of unshared electron pairs from free atoms of the biomolecule to the metal conducting electrons (e.g. sulphur-gold) | ||
Adaptive molecules Affinity-based receptor-ligand systems such as streptavidin–biotin |
Covalent interactions | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|
Chemical bond between biomolecules and the surface of NPs |
• Thermally stable (desirable in applications that require thermo cycling) • Allows 10–40% more protein via covalent • Prevents elution of bound protein increasing the stability • Correct spatial biomolecule orientation can be difficult via physical adsorption, whilst covalent attachment can orient the molecule properly, yielding increased activity and lower reagent consumption |
• Effectiveness limitations when release is required as in drug release systems • Attachment of highly active antibodies can be impaired due to pH requirement for successful cross-linking reaction • Depending on the strategy, covalent binding can originate random orientation of proteins reducing its biomolecule activity • Covalent attachment can force the protein to have unfavourable interactions with the NP surface coating ligand, causing unfolding |
Conjugation chemistry Exploiting functional groups on both particles and biomolecules such as bifunctional linkers of mediator linkers | ||
Maleimide coupling Diels–Alder cycloadditions with dienes; 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions with nitrones and azides; Michael-type additions with thiols and amines | ||
Click chemistry Refers to a family of reactions that are modular, stereospecific, and high yielding |