Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 1;9:975464. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.975464

TABLE 4.

Odds ratios comparisons between women and men.

Variables Δβ eΔβ 95% CI Z-score P-value
FM 1.34 3.82 0.37, 2.31 2.70 0.007
FFM –1.81 0.16 −3.12, −0.50 –2.70 0.007
BCM –1.80 0.16 −3.08, −0.53 –2.77 0.006
BMR_m –1.43 0.24 −2.48, −0.38 –2.67 0.008
ICW –1.78 0.17 −3.06, −0.51 –2.74 0.006
ECW –1.49 0.22 −2.81, −0.17 –2.22 0.027
ICW_ECW –0.43 0.65 −0.91, 0.04 –1.79 0.073
Ri_Re_upper 0.36 1.44 −0.15, 0.87 1.39 0.163
Ri_Re_lower 0.43 1.54 −0.06, 0.92 1.72 0.085
Xc_upper –0.08 0.93 −0.51, 0.36 –0.35 0.725
Xc_lower –0.22 0.80 −0.66, 0.22 –0.97 0.330
PA_upper –0.37 0.69 −0.88, 0.14 –1.42 0.156
PA_lower –0.50 0.61 −0.99, −0.01 –2.01 0.045

Δβ, beta difference; eΔβ, exponential of beta difference; CI, confidence interval. The comparisons were made using the model which adjusted for age, education years, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, osteoarthritis, height, and weight in both women and men. The p-value of lower than 0.05 were presented in boldface.