Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 7;28(45):6328–6344. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i45.6328

Table 4.

Nutraceuticals used to improve disease severity and outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 patients

Nutraceuticals
Number of patients with vs without nutraceutical agent
Results
Ref.
Probiotic combined Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus and Enterococcus 179 vs 196 Shorter time to clinical improvement (fever, hospital stay, viral shedding) in hospitalized COVID-19 subjects [153]
Probiotic Lactobacillus hamnosus GG 566 vs 566 Extended time until the development of infection with COVID-19, reduced the severity of the disease, changed the composition of the intestinal microbiota in the household contact infected with COVID-19 (after 28 d) [154]
Probiotic Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis, Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum 99 vs 101 The duration of diarrhea was shorter in patients who received the probiotic than in those who did not. No significant effect on mortality, no change in most biomarkers in patients with COVID-19 in hospitalized patients (at 14 d) [155]
Vitamin D3 (single oral bolus of 80000 IU) 57 vs 9 The severity of COVID-19 decreased. Improved survival rate [156]
25-hydroxyvitamin D3 50 vs 26 Reduced the need for treatment in the ICU in patients hospitalized due to proven COVID-19 [157]
Quercetin 21 vs 21 Decreased virus clearance, frequency of symptoms and level of LDH and ferritin parameters [158]

ICU: Intensive care unit; LDH: Lactate dehydrogenase; COVID-19: Coronavirus disease 2019.