. 2022 Dec 15;41:345. doi: 10.1186/s13046-022-02551-7

Table 1.

Relevance analysis of NAT10 expression in CRC patients

Varible	All patients	NAT10		P value
Varible	All patients	High	Low	P value
All Cases	80	40	40
Age (years)
60	23	15	8	0.084
≥ 60	57	25	32	0.084
Gender
Male	50	22	28	0.166
Female	30	18	12	0.166
Tumor site
Colon	35	21	14	0.115
Rectum	45	19	26	0.115
Tumor size (cm)
5	49	26	23	0.491
≥ 5	31	14	17	0.491
TNM staging system
T1 + T2	33	13	20	0.112
T3 + T4	47	27	20	0.112
Tumor stage
Stage I + II	43	9	34	< 0.001 ^*
Stage III + IV	37	31	6	< 0.001 ^*
Lymph node metastasis
No	46	11	35	< 0.001 ^*
Yes	34	29	5	< 0.001 ^*
Vascular invasion
No	61	25	36	0.004 ^*
Yes	19	15	4	0.004 ^*
Nerve invasion
No	66	30	36	0.078
Yes	14	10	4	0.078
Distant metastasis
No	63	27	36	0.014 ^*
Yes	17	13	4	0.014 ^*
CEA (ng/ml)
5	49	21	28	0.108
≥ 5	31	19	12	0.108

The bold type represents P values smaller than 0.05

TNM Tumour node metastasis, CEA Carcinoembryonic antige

P < 0.05 was considered significant