Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 15;41:345. doi: 10.1186/s13046-022-02551-7

Table 2.

Relevance analysis of KIF23 expression in CRC patients

Varible All patients KIF23 P value
High Low
All Cases 80 40 40
Age (years)
 60 23 13 10 0.459
 ≥ 60 57 27 30
Gender
 Male 50 26 24 0.644
 Female 30 14 16
Tumor site
 Colon 35 23 12 0.013 *
 Rectum 45 17 28
Tumor size (cm)
 5 49 25 24 0.819
 ≥ 5 31 15 16
TNM staging system
 T1 + T2 33 13 20 0.112
 T3 + T4 47 27 20
Tumor stage
 Stage I + II 43 16 27 0.014 *
 Stage III + IV 37 24 13
Lymph node metastasis
 No 46 18 28 0.024 *
 Yes 34 22 12
Vascular invasion
 No 61 28 33 0.189
 Yes 19 12 7
Nerve invasion
 No 66 28 38 0.003 *
 Yes 14 12 2
Distant metastasis
 No 63 28 35 0.056
 Yes 17 12 5
CEA (ng/ml)
 5 49 18 31 0.003 *
  ≥ 5 31 22 9

The bold type represents P values smaller than 0.05

TNM Tumour node metastasis, CEA Carcinoembryonic antige

P < 0.05 was considered significant