Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Dec 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2008 Jan 22;19(3):428–436. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2007.11.012

Table 5:

Differences between subjects dichotomized by gender, shoulder width and arm length. Bold values indicate p-values < 0.05

ParameterDichotomized Variable Gendera Shoulder Widtha Arm Lengtha
Women Men p-valueb Smaller (nf=13)c Larger (nf=2)c p-valueb Smaller (nf=12)c Larger (nf=3)c p-valueb
Mean keyboard Force (% MVC) 2.8 (1.5) 2.0 (0.7) 0.04 2.9 (1.5) 2.0 (0.7) 0.02 2.9 (1.5) 1.9 (0.6) 0.02
Median keyboard force (%MVC) 2.3 (1.5) 1.5 (0.7) 0.03 2.3 (1.5) 1.4 (0.7) 0.02 2.3 (1.5) 1.4 (0.7) 0.02
90th percentile keyboard force (% MVC) 6.1 (2.5) 4.7 (1.3) 0.03 6.2 (2.4) 4.6 (1.3) 0.01 6.2 (2.5) 4.5 (1.0) 0.01
50th %tile FCR EMG (% MVC) 6.6 (1.1) 3.8 (0.5) 0.01 5.6 (0.6) 4.8 (1.2) 0.27 6.5 (1.2) 3.9 (0.4) 0.02
50th %tile ECR EMG(% MVC) 15.0 (3.8) 8.1 (1.0) 0.05 14.9 (4.0) 8.2 (1.0) 0.05 14.9 (4.0) 8.2 (0.9) 0.05
50th %tile Trapezius EMG (% MVC) 7.0 (1.1) 5.0 (1.0) 0.10 7.7 (1.3) 4.4 (0.5) 0.01 6.3 (1.2) 5.8 (1.0) 0.38
Range of Motion of Wrist Extension (deg) 16.3 (1.1) 13.3 (1.1) 0.04 15.9 (1.2) 13.8 (1.2) 0.13 16.7 (1.1) 13.0 (1.1) 0.03
Range of Motion of Wrist R/U (deg) 10.9 (0.8) 10.0 (0.8) 0.24 11.0 (0.8) 9.9 (0.8) 0.15 12.1 (0.7) 8.8 (0.7) 0.00
Shoulder Flexion/Extension ROM (deg) 9.9 (0.7) 7.8 (0.8) 0.02 10.0 (0.8) 7.6 (0.6) 0.00 10.3 (0.7) 7.4 (0.7) 0.00
Shoulder Abduction 90th%tile (deg) 9.6 (1.4) 8.1 (1.3) 0.21 9.4 (1.5) 8.4 (1.4) 0.3 10.4 (1.6) 7.3 (1.0) 0.05
Median Shoulder External Rotation (deg) 35.0 (6.5) 14.2 (4.8) 0.01 35.4 (6.4) 13.8 (4.8) 0.00 39.0 (6.5) 10.1 (2.5) 0.00
a

There were no significant differences between groups in terms of age and typing speed

b

p-values are from single sided student t-test testing if the values for women or smaller anthropometry were larger than values for men or larger anthropometry

c

nf = number of females in the group of 15 total.