Table 3.
Breakdown of key arguments made on the HPL in submissions.
| Theme | Argument | Instances raised | Stakeholders raising argument (n) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Economic considerations | Effect on small and medium enterprises (SMEs) Negative effect on the economy Job losses Economic benefits of the tax |
34 | Academia (5) Civil Society (6) Industry (5) Industry Associations (11) Health Associations (2) Labour (3) Other (2) |
| Impact on the vulnerable | Impact on the poor/regressive nature of the tax Impact on children |
26 | Academia (4) Civil Society (5) Industry (4) Industry Associations (5) Health Associations (4) Labour (3) Other (1) |
| The responsiveness of an SSB tax to the problem of obesity | Support of government action to reduce obesity Complexity of the problem of obesity Alternative actions to the tax through voluntary measures, public-private partnerships and other existing measures Health benefits of the tax |
38 | Academia (5) Civil Society (7) Industry (6) Industry Associations (11) Health Associations (4) Labour (3) Other (2) |
| The appropriateness of an SSB tax in South Africa | Evidence on efficacy, impact and feasibility of the tax Administrative burden of implementing the tax Efficacy of the tax in other countries |
43 | Academia (7) Civil Society (8) Industry (6) Industry Associations (9) Industry Research (3) Health Associations (5) Labour (3) Other (2) |
| Procedural concerns | Public engagement Stakeholder and cross-sectoral engagement Jurisdiction Evaluation of socio-economic impact Delay adoption of the tax |
23 | Academia (2) Civil Society (2) Industry (5) Industry Associations (8) Health Associations (1) Labour (3) Other (2) |
| Structure of the tax | Scope of the tax Appropriate tax rate Exemptions or threshold Potential earmarking and use of revenue Inclusion of 100% fruit juices and dairy products |
33 | Academia (7) Civil Society (5) Industry (7) Industry Associations (5) Industry Research (2) Health Associations (3) Labour (2) Other (2) |