Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 15;17(12):e0278879. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278879

Table 2. Overview study and sample characteristics.

Authors (year of publication) Place Target population Study focus (type of app) Study design Sampling; (rr); representativity Sample size (N(m/f)) Mean age +/- SD; (r) in yrs.; age groups (n) Data gathering methods
Bol et al. [54] (2018)
The Netherlands smart device owners; Dutch adults (aged >18 yrs.) general health apps, including nutrition and fitness apps quantitative, cross-sectional study sample drawn from a panel based on a representative sample of the Dutch population (CentERdata’s LISSPANEL); rr not provided 1079 (495/584) 50.32 +/- 16.35; (r = 18–89) standardized questionnaire; online survey
Cabrita et al. [55] (2019)
The Netherlands general population; Dutch community-dwelling older adults (target age group not specified) general health apps, including nutrition and fitness apps qualitative (case) study sample drawn from 1. local information markets to promote healthy behaviors in the region of Overijssel (NL), 2. information sessions given to participants in the European Project PERSSILLA 12 69; (r = 65–78) qualitative semi-structured interviews (pre and post app use within case study; Note: for the purpose of this review, only results prior to app exposure are reported)
Wichmann et al. [53] (2019)
Germany German fitness app users and non-users (aged >50 yrs.) fitness apps qualitative, cross-sectional study participants recruited via the associated online survey of the mixed methods study; offline: flyers, gatekeepers of sport clubs and other initiatives; online: advertisements N = 15 (7/8) individuals; 3 focus groups: 1. app users: n = 5, n_m = 5, 2. non-users. n = 4, n_f = 4, 3. non-users. n = 6, n_f = 4 61.3 +/- 8.7; 3 focus groups: 1. fitness app users: 63.0 +/- 4.5, 2. non-users: 68.8 +/- 9.8, 3. non-users: 55.0 +/- 6.6 qualitative focus group discussions
König et al. [52] (2018)
Germany general population; German adults (aged >18 yrs.) nutrition and fitness apps quantitative, cross-sectional study sample drawn from a local longitudinal cohort study (Konstanz Life Study); rr not provided 1215 (432/783) 41.11 +/- 17.56 standardized questionnaire; paper-pencil survey
Naszay et al. [56] (2018)
Austria Internet users; Swiss adults (target age group not specified) general health apps, including nutrition and fitness apps quantitative, cross-sectional study four-phase snowball-sampling (offline (e.g. health-related professional associations) & online (e.g. health forums, Facebook); rr not provided 562 (231/331) 36.9 +/- 1.2; n<35 yrs. = 305 n≥35 yrs. = 257 Self-validated standardized questionnaire (validated by pilot test with N = 20 health professionals); online survey
Mackert et al. [51] (2016)
USA patients (not specified), American adults (target age group not specified) general health apps, including nutrition and fitness apps quantitative, cross-sectional study sample drawn from an invitation-only research panel (not specified);rr not provided; representative for the USA demographic composition regarding gender, age, ethnicity, socioeconomic status 4974
(2102/2872)
43.5 +/- 16.7 standardized questionnaire; online survey
Seifert et al. [57] (2017)
Switzerland general population; Swiss older adults (aged >50 yrs.) fitness apps quantitative, cross-sectional study simple random sample drawn from commercial AZ-Direct database (based on public phone book); rr = 18%; sample representative for age, gender, education, language region 1013 (475/538) 65.3; SD not reported
(r = 50–80+); n_50–64 = 522 n_65–79 = 358 n_≥80 = 133
standardized questionnaire; computer assisted telephone interview

Note. yrs. = years; rr = response rate; m = male, f = female; SD = standard deviation; r = range