Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 15;17(12):e0278879. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278879

Table 4. Fitness and nutrition app acceptance investigated by the qualitative study by Cabrita et al. [55].

Theme Subtheme(s) Specifications
app usage fitness app no current usage
nutrition app no current usage
no future usage (no need, self-perceived high activity level (n = 2))
attitudes towards app (pre usage) fitness app interest / desirability barriers / reluctance to usage
general to the beginning of the interview:
  • overall reluctance / rejection (n = 12)

    during the course of the interview:

  • hypothetical usage (“maybe”) (n = 6), still rejecting (n = 6)

perceived usefulness
  • no benefit seen, preference to rely on own bodily feelings to assess activity level (n = 5)

expected behavior change
  • usage leads to decreased attention to body signals (n = 1)

privacy concerns
  • none mentioned

nutrition app interest / desirability barriers / reluctance to usage
general
  • vague, hypothetical interest after specific suggestions by interviewers (“maybe that could be something” answered) (n = “mostly answered”)

perceived usefulness
  • self-monitoring dietary practices established, no need of technological support (n = “some participants”)

  • digital monitoring too time-consuming (n = “others”)

  • preference to talk to someone (n = 1)

privacy concerns
  • none mentioned

wishes and expectations towards apps fitness app wishes and expectations monitoring functions
  • overview daily physical activity regarding intensity, number of steps (n = 6)

  • overview daily distance walked and biked (n = 2)

  • overview calories burnt (n = 2)

  • distinction between activities performed indoors/outdoors (n = 1)

motivating features
  • personalized coaching of daily physical activity goals, tailored to health status, age and gender (n = 3)

  • setting of own activity goals (n = 1)

  • gamified coaching system, e.g., collecting points (n = 1)

social exchange features
  • comparison to activity of peers (“most participants”)

expectations positive
  • expected behavioral adaptation according to feedback (n = “most participants”)

negative
  • distraction by digital monitoring (“attention theft”) (n = 1)

  • overview of time spent inactive too confronting (n = 1)

nutrition app wishes monitoring functions
  • caloric and /or nutritional intake (n = 4)

motivating features
  • healthy recipes tailored to medical background and needs (n = 4)

social exchange features
  • sharing of nutritional knowledge with peers (n = 1)

Note: Themes, subthemes and specifications presented here are a result of the review synthesis process resp. thematic analysis, i.e., this table depicts an abstraction resp. deduction of the primary study [55] results and only involves study results addressing the review questions.