Table 2. Highly cited AI algorithms graded by their interpretability, dynamicity, precision, autonomy, fairness, and reproducibility.
Primary author | Algorithm application | Explainable | Dynamic | Precise | Autonomous | Fair | Reproducible |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gulshan | Detecting diabetic retinopathy | No | N/A | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
Iorio | Predicting tumor sensitivity to pharmacotherapies | Yes | N/A | Yes | No | Yes | No |
Kamnitsas | Brain lesion segmentation | Yes | N/A | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Ott | Predicting human lymphocyte antigen binding | No | N/A | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Savova | Extracting information from clinical free text in EHRs | No | N/A | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
Tajbakhsh | Medical image classification, detection, and segmentation | No | N/A | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
Wolfe | Identifying and assessing severity of fibromyalgia | Yes | N/A | Yes | No | No | No |
Xiong | Predicting splicing regulation for mRNA sequences | Yes | N/A | Yes | Yes | No | No |
AI, artificial intelligence; EHR, electronic health record; N/A, not applicable (i.e., temporal changes and continuous monitoring were not applicable to these algorithms and their intended use).