Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Dec 15.
Published in final edited form as: Radiology. 2020 Mar 17;295(2):418–427. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020192256

Table 1:

Estimated Values for Number of Procedures, Collective Effective Doses, and Average Individual Effective Doses according to Modality for 2006 and 2016

Analysis Metrics CT* Radiography Noncardiac Interventional Fluoroscopy Cardiac Interventional Fluoroscopy Dental Nuclear Medicine Total
Summary 2016
 No. of procedures (in millions) 74 275 4 4.1 320 13.5 691
 Collective effective dose (person-Sv)
  With ICRP 2007 tissue-weighting factors (SUS 103) 444 000 71 000 40 000 42 000 14 000 106 000 717 000
  With ICRP 1990 tissue-weighting factors (SUS 60) 469 000 71 000 40 000 42 000 NA 133 000 755 000
 Average individual effective dose (mSv)
  With tissue-weighting factors from ICRP 2007 (EUS 103) 1.37 0.22 0.12 0.13 0.04 0.32 2.2
  With tissue-weighting factors from ICRP 1990 (EUS 60) 1.45 0.22 0.12 0.13 NA 0.41 2.3
Summary 2006
 No. of procedures (in millions) 62 281 12 4.6 500 17
 Collective effective dose with tissue-weighting factors from ICRP 1990 (SUS 60) (person-Sv) 438 000 97 000 60 200 68 000 2530 220 000 885 000
 Average individual effective dose with tissue-weighting factors from ICRP 1990 (EUS 60) (mSv) 1.46 0.30 0.20 0.23 0.73 2.9

Note.—The effective dose values were estimated using tissue-weighting factors from International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) 1990 (8) and ICRP 2007 (9). Values have been rounded. Adapted with permission of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP). EUS 60 = average effective dose per person in the United States using tissue-weighting factors from reference 8, EUS 103 = average effective dose per person in the United States using tissue-weighting factors from reference 9, NA = not available, SUS 60 = collective effective dose for the United States using tissue-weighting factors from reference 8, SUS 103 = collective effective dose for the United States using tissue-weighting factors from reference 9.

*

For CT, the values are for procedures. The estimated number of scans in 2006 and 2016 were 67 million and 84 million, respectively.

Numbers of images.

Value adjusted from NCRP Report 160 due to an extrapolation that was likely an overestimate.