Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 10;205:109956. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2021.109956

Table 2.

Environmental performance and financial constraints.

Ratings Size Dividends Kaplan–Zingales score Size–Age score Ratings Ratings
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
Financial constraint measure −3.226*** −9.848*** −4.111*** −1.656*** −2.818*** −3.107*** −1.764***
(0.490) (0.177) (0.532) (0.470) (0.576) (0.498) (0.433)

Control variables Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Country, Sector, and time fixed effects Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No
Country-time, sector fixed effects No No No No No Yes No
Firm and time fixed effects No No No No No No Yes

R2 0.491 0.489 0.493 0.480 0.490 0.505 0.445
Observations 54,106 54,106 53,482 46,853 54,106 54,106 54,461
# of firms 7016 7016 6925 6144 7016 7016 7080

This table reports regression estimates of environmental scores on measures of financial constraints and control variables. The data are from Refinitiv Datastream and Standard and Poor’s. “Size” is the log of total assets, and the sign of this variable is reversed so that higher values indicate smaller firms). All right-hand side variables are lagged by one year. Control variables are firm size (log of total assets) and firm profitability (earnings before interest expense and income taxes). Standard errors are clustered at the firm level. ***, **, or * indicates that the coefficient estimate is significant at the 1%, 5%, or 10% level, respectively.