Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 2;44:e2022063. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2022063

Table 2.

Associations between plant-based diet indices and abdominal obesity incidence (n=6,054)

Variables Baseline diet only
Most recent diet
Cumulative average
No. of cases/person-yr Multivariable-adjusted1 No. of cases/person-yr Multivariable-adjusted1 No. of cases/person-yr Multivariable-adjusted1
PDI
Q1 321/9,013 1.00 (reference) 343/8,503 1.00 (reference) 379/8,812 1.00 (reference)
Q2 351/9,025 1.13 (0.97, 1.31) 352/9,392 1.00 (0.86, 1.16) 298/9,013 0.74 (0.64, 0.87)
Q3 372/10,406 0.93 (0.80, 1.08) 395/10,307 0.94 (0.82, 1.09) 403/11,066 0.79 (0.68, 0.90)
Q4 353/8,603 0.97 (0.83, 1.13) 342/9,199 0.85 (0.73, 0.99) 272/8,259 0.66 (0.56, 0.77)
Q5 381/8,771 1.06 (0.92, 1.24) 346/8,418 0.94 (0.81, 1.10) 426/8,667 0.94 (0.82, 1.08)
p for trend2 0.990 0.119 0.379
hPDI
Q1 318/9,778 1.00 (reference) 339/8,903 1.00 (reference) 343/8,874 1.00 (reference)
Q2 340/9,406 1.11 (0.95, 1.29) 344/9,785 0.86 (0.74, 1.00) 328/9,793 0.77 (0.66, 0.90)
Q3 322/8,256 1.09 (0.93, 1.27) 333/9,006 0.82 (0.71, 0.96) 341/9,220 0.83 (0.72, 0.97)
Q4 400/9,218 1.24 (1.06, 1.44) 394/9,752 0.87 (0.75, 1.01) 371/9,567 0.86 (0.74, 1.00)
Q5 398/9,160 1.09 (0.94, 1.27) 368/8,372 0.97 (0.83, 1.12) 395/8,363 0.94 (0.81, 1.09)
p for trend2 0.110 0.826 0.963
uPDI
Q1 304/10,259 1.00 (reference) 321/10,345 1.00 (reference) 306/9,633 1.00 (reference)
Q2 336/9,661 1.17 (1.00, 1.37) 335/9,979 1.06 (0.91, 1.23) 327/9,616 1.06 (0.90, 1.24)
Q3 321/8,280 1.34 (1.14, 1.57) 303/7,834 1.20 (1.02, 1.41) 334/9,237 1.11 (0.95, 1.30)
Q4 364/8,833 1.34 (1.14, 1.56) 418/9,291 1.37 (1.18, 1.59) 357/9,320 1.15 (0.98, 1.35)
Q5 453/8,786 1.70 (1.46, 1.98) 401/8,369 1.52 (1.30, 1.78) 454/8,012 1.76 (1.51, 2.06)
p for trend2 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

Values are presented as hazard ratio (95% confidence interval).

Q, quintile; PDI, plant-based diet index; hPDI, healthy plant-based diet index; uPDI, unhealthy plant-based diet index; MET, metabolic equivalent of task.

1

The multivariable-adjusted model was adjusted for age (years), gender (men or women), total energy intake (kcal/day), high school graduate (yes or no), physical activity level (METs), current smoking (yes or no), alcohol intake (g/day), and body mass index at baseline.

2

Treating the median value of each group as a continuous variable using a Cox proportional-hazard model.