Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Physiol Behav. 2022 Nov 9;258:114028. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2022.114028

Table 2.

Regression model estimates of non-linear relationships between levels of FCRS scores and changes in physiological responses during the food exposure paradigm.

FCRS Change in DFA alpha-1 Change in SDNN Change in HF/LF ratio
Quantiles Estimate 95% CI Estimate 95% CI Estimate 95% CI
(Min:11) −0.05 (−1.60, 1.41) 0.40 (−1.02, 1.74) −0.09 (−1.62, 1.36)
(12:15) −0.88 (−2.49, 0.70) −0.52 (−2.11, 1.00) −0.53 (−2.15, 0.99)
(16:19) −0.94 (−4.58, 2.52) 0.35 (−2.89, 3.58) 0.03 (−3.62, 3.43)
(20:Max) 2.97 (0.31, 5.93) 3.71 (1.19, 7.10) 1.04 (−1.11, 3.38)

FCRS: Food Cue Responsivity Scale; Model adjusts for age, sex, ethnicity; 95% CI = 95% credible interval; DFA α1 represents the non-linear domain, SDNN represents the time domain, and HF/LF ratio represents the frequency domain.