Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 29;6(12):1625–1633. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01425-4

Table 2.

Regression of current institutional prestige based on childhood SES

Model I Model II Model III
Urban neighbourhood 0.129 0.552 0.914
[−3.042 to 3.206] [−2.601 to 3.751] [−2.255 to 4.361]
P = 0.938 P = 0.742 P = 0.588
Avg. income −1.447* −1.352*
[−4.569 to −0.625] [−4.381 to −0.578]
P = 0.001 P = 0.003
Parents’ highest degree:
Elementary −2.946
[−12.995 to 7.747]
P = 0.579
Some HS −1.816
[−13.870 to 10.393]
P = 0.711
HS −4.873*
[−9.125 to −0.948]
P = 0.024
College −4.416*
[−8.380 to −0.372]
P = 0.030
Masters −5.177*
[−8.743 to −1.570]
P = 0.007
Ph.D. −6.889*
[−10.536 to −2.850]
P = 0.001
Adjusting for discipline, race/ethnicity, gender, Ph.D. prestige Yes Yes Yes
Adjusted R2 0.105 0.107 0.109

Institutional prestige is an ordinal ranking from 1 to 100. Covariates include neighbourhood, income and parents’ education levels, adjusting for discipline, race/ethnicity, gender and Ph.D. ranking. Bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals in brackets, and coefficients with P < 0.05 are denoted by the asterisk. Baseline is women in Anthropology from urban neighbourhoods whose parents’ highest education was some college.