Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 2;9:1068567. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1068567

TABLE 1.

Efficacy of FMT on UC patients with six double-blind, randomized controlled trials.

References Rossen et al. (17) Moayyedi et al. (18) Paramsothy et al. (19) Costello et al. (20) Haifer et al.
(22)
Crothers et al. (21)
Number of patients 48 (FMT: 23, placebo: 25) 75 (FMT: 38, placebo: 37) 81 (FMT: 41, placebo: 40) 73 (FMT: 38, placebo: 35) 35 (FMT: 15, placebo: 20) 12 (FMT: 6, placebo: 6)
Patient criteria Mild-moderate (11 ≥ SCCAI ≥ 4, MES ≥ 1) Mild-severe (Mayo: 4–12, MES ≥ 1) Mild-moderate (Mayo: 4–10, MES ≥ 1/PGA ≤ 2) Mild-moderate (Mayo: 3–10, MES ≥ 2) Mild-moderate (Mayo: 4–10, MES ≥ 1) Mayo: 4–10, MES ≥ 1, RBC ≥ 1, SFS ≥ 1
Pre-treatment Bowel lavage None Bowel lavage Bowel lavage Amoxicillin, doxycycline, and metronidazole. Ciprofloxacin, metronidazole, and bowel lavage
Steroid Concomitant (<10 mg) Concomitant Taper 2.5 mg/w to free Taper 5 mg/w to free Taper 2.5 mg/w to free free
FMT 2 times 6 times 41 times 3 times 49 times 85 times
Donor Single Single Multiple (3–7 donors) Multiple (3–4 donors) Single Single
Stool Fresh Fresh/frozen Frozen −80°C Frozen −80°C Lyophilized Frozen −20°C
Primary endpoint (FMT vs. placebo) CR + ER at week 12
30 vs. 20%, p = 0.51
CR + ER at week 7
24 vs. 5%, p = 0.03
CR + ER/Er at week 8
27 vs. 8%, p = 0.02
CR + ER at week 8
32 vs. 9%, p = 0.03
CR + ER/Er at week 8
53 vs. 15%, p = 0.027
CR at week 12
2/6 vs. 0/6, p = 0.45
Clinical remission (FMT vs. placebo) 30 vs. 32%, p = 1.0 24 vs. 5%, p = 0.03 44 vs. 20%, p = 0.02 47 vs. 17%, p = 0.01 73 vs. 25%, p = 0.0045 /