Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 2;10:1053428. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1053428

Table 1.

Strengths and roles of relevant stakeholders.

Strengths Stakeholder category Roles
Inline graphic Managerial leadership
Inline graphic Building partnerships and communication
Inline graphic Checking whether the designed package is realistic within the existing contextual settings in which it will operate
Inline graphic Anticipating and overcoming problems
Program managers Inline graphic Technical alliance and coalition support for the coproduction of the intervention package
Inline graphic Offering sustained support
Inline graphic Determining and clarifying what resources are required along with what roles other people can play
Inline graphic To maximize the use of resources and opportunities.
Inline graphic Creating a structure for implementation
Inline graphic Well aware of characteristics of the population to be catered
Inline graphic Determining whether the proposed program is realistic and feasible within the context of the organization in which it will be implemented
Inline graphic To anticipate and overcome problems
Health care providers Inline graphic Facilitate refinement and improvements in the package based on real-time context and experience
Inline graphic Effectively communicate its success and benefits
Inline graphic To clarify the resources available
Inline graphic Creating supportive environment
Inline graphic Compatibility or fit with the local setting
Inline graphic To fit local circumstances
Inline graphic Suggesting capacity-building strategies
Inline graphic Compatibility or fit with the local setting
Inline graphic Need of the tobacco users
Inline graphic What clicks and appeals to the users and what doesn't
Inline graphic Can share their expectations, perceptions, and beliefs that tobacco use could interact with current medication or NCD condition
Inline graphic Share their expectations from healthcare providers
Tobacco users Inline graphic Suggest the modifications required in the intervention package to suit their requirements
Inline graphic Utilize the information and resources
Inline graphic Share their inconvenience, fear, shame, risks, and benefits
Inline graphic Refine the package for developing targeted messaging
Inline graphic Suggest for patient-centered outcomes
Inline graphic Seek their honest feedback and active participation in discussions
Inline graphic Aware of the characteristics of the population to be reached
Inline graphic Engaging civil society sectors could contribute to a change in the public perception of an issue
Civil society Inline graphic Suggesting regional and contextual anecdotes and case studies illustrating these points
Inline graphic Compatibility or fit with the local setting
Inline graphic Suggest edits for refinement in the package to fit the cultural relevance
Inline graphic To anticipate and overcome problems.
Inline graphic Sound knowledge of theory
Inline graphic Aware of the gaps
Inline graphic Content and frequency of intervention
Inline graphic Technical and scientific rigor to the intervention package
Subject experts Inline graphic Creating a structure for implementation
Inline graphic Suggest capacity-building strategies for the
Inline graphic human resource
Inline graphic Suggest reviewing, management, and decision-making processes
Inline graphic Suggest application of behavior change theories
Inline graphic to the package