Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 2;12:1016958. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1016958

Table 2.

The significant associations of DNA repair gene expression profiles with clinical data of EOC patients (N = 60, only significant results with P ≤ 0.01 are shown).

Gene Age pM Residuum Grade a EOC type b
HUS1 P=0.008 NS NS NS NS
PMS2 P=0.01 NS NS NS NS
POLH P=0.009 NS NS NS NS
RECQL5 P=0.009 NS NS NS P=0.001
RPA1 P=0.005 NS NS NS NS
XAB2 P=0.005 NS NS NS NS
DUT NS P=0.0003 NS NS NS
FANCI NS P=0.01 NS NS NS
PALB2 NS NS P=0.002 NS NS
TDG NS NS P=0.007 NS NS
ERCC2 NS NS NS NS P=0.01
PCNA NS NS NS P=0.001 P=0.001
ALKBH3 NS NS NS NS P=0.006
FAN1 NS NS NS NS P=0.003
MSH3 NS NS NS NS P=0.008
TOBP1 NS NS NS NS P=0.002
XPC NS NS NS NS P=0.006
LIG3 NS NS NS NS P=0.004
RECQL4 NS NS NS NS P=0.01
PMS1 NS NS NS NS NS
a

Patients divided into two groups: Group 1 (Grade 1 and Grade 2), Group 2 (Grade 3).

b

Patients divided into two groups: Group 1 (HGSC type), Group 2 (Others type).

Significant result after FDR correction is displayed in bold. NS, not significant.