Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 14;12(12):e065688. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065688

Table 3.

Process evaluation domains, questions and data collection

Process evaluation domains Research questions Core information Data type Data sources Records kept
Across domains: What are some unanticipated consequences of the Navigator Programme?
Domain 1: Implementation To what extent was the Navigator Programme (the intervention) implemented and delivered as intended? Fidelity: quality of the intervention delivery, capturing the nature of what was delivered and not just the specific activities Interviews
Non-participant observation
Research and implementation team meetings
Documentation from planning phase
Interviews with HOCs, hospital physicians and staff, and community service providers, who interact with the Navigator Programme, and with the implementation team
Bi-weekly research team meetings; meetings with HOC and implementation team
Team records
Audio recordings and transcripts, field notes and memos, meeting notes, and memos about team records
What was delivered in practice? Dose: amount of and type of activity Participant interactions with intervention: no and nature of interactions between the HOCs and participants, community service providers, and healthcare team for each participant HOC patient chart for all study participants in the intervention arm
Meetings with HOCs and implementation team to discuss participant discharge from programme
Chart review and meeting notes
Domain 2: Mechanisms
2 a. Mechanisms of Impact and Change
What were the key ingredients and elements of the intervention?
Which elements of the intervention supported meeting intervention goals?
Which elements of the intervention challenged meeting intervention goals?
Mechanisms of impact and change (eg, trust and rapport, relationship-building, communication) will be explored qualitatively Interviews
Non-participant observation
Research and implementation team meetings
Interviews with HOCs, hospital physicians and staff, and community service providers, who interact with the Navigator Programme, and with study participants in both the intervention and control arms
Shadowing HOCs during their day-to-day workflow in the hospital and in the community
Bi-weekly research team meetings and meetings with HOCs and implementation team
Audio recordings and transcripts, field notes and memos, and meeting notes
2b. Mechanisms of Implementation What were the barriers and facilitators to implementing the intervention? Mechanisms of implementation (eg, acceptability of the intervention in the implementation setting) will be explored qualitatively Interviews
Non-participant observation
Research and implementation team meetings
Interviews with HOCs, implementation team, hospital physicians and staff, and community service providers, who interact with the Navigator programme
Shadowing HOCs during their day-to-day workflow in the hospital and in the community
Bi-weekly research team meetings and meetings with HOC and implementation team
Audio recordings and transcripts, field notes and memos, and meeting notes
Domain 3: Context What features of context influenced the intervention implementation and reaching intervention goals? Characteristics of implementation setting (eg, hospital services) Interviews
Research and implementation team meetings
Documentation from planning phase
Interviews with HOCs, implementation team, hospital physicians and staff, and community service providers, who interact with the Navigator Programme
Biweekly research team meetings and meetings with HOCs and implementation team
Team records
Audio recordings and transcripts, field notes and memos, meeting notes, and memos about team records
How do features of context influence intervention implementation and the activities and services delivered?
How do features of the intervention shape the implementation context?
The dynamic influence between multiple domains of the internal and external domains of context (eg, organisational setting, socioeconomic context, and community resources) and implementation and programme activities delivered Interviews
non-participant observation
Research and implementation team meetings
Documentation from planning phase
Interviews with HOCs, hospital physicians and staff, and community service providers, who interact with the Navigator Programme, and with study participants in both the intervention and control arms
Shadowing HOCs during their day-to-day workflow in the hospital and in the community
Biweekly research team meetings and meetings with HOCs and implementation team
Team records
Audio recordings and transcripts, field notes and memos, meeting notes, and memos about team records

HOCs, Homeless Outreach Counsellors.