Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 25;121:105875. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105875

Table 4.

Mediation analysis between depression and PSU by Process model 4.

Outcome variables Independent variables β SE t P
PSU constant 29.968*** 4.631 6.471 0.000
Age −0.150 0.224 −0.670 0.503
Gendera 0.643 0.633 1.016 0.310
Depression 0.382*** 0.038 10.153 0.000



Resilience constant 93.169*** 7.934 11.743 0.000
Age 0.515 0.383 1.344 0.179
Gendera −5.766*** 1.084 −5.137 0.000
Depression −0.718*** 0.064 −11.143 0.000



Perceived social support constant 58.777*** 7.027 8.336 0.000
Age 0.505 0.339 1.488 0.137
Gendera −0.995 0.960 −1.036 0.300
Depression −0.699*** 0.057 −12.255 0.000



School belonging constant 81.162*** 6.802 11.933 0.000
Age 0.151 0.328 0.461 0.645
Gendera −1.010 0.930 −1.087 0.277
Depression −0.752*** 0.055 −13.624 0.000



PSU constant 38.709*** 5.087 7.610 0.000
Age −0.136 0.220 −0.618 0.536
Gendera 0.110 0.634 0.174 0.862
Resilience −0.097*** 0.022 −4.358 0.000
Perceived social support 0.091*** 0.027 3.430 0.001
School belonging −0.062* 0.027 −2.325 0.020
Depression 0.329*** 0.042 7.797 0.000

Note. N = 847, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗∗p < 0.001. PSU = Problematic smartphone use.

a

Male = 1, female = 2.